血玫瑰1970
[=电影解说]

　　The first real film from, `%a #[^dir#ector ^ who went on t#* o do a [lot of interest_in_g \w* 
or-;#k in the 19709%s an*#*d 80's _^be$(for-e his$^/ tragic^ deat*,$h( b/(_y ;#drowning =+, `in 1986.　　An; avowed homa -ge *to Eyes ^,W:_ i#
thout a Fa ^% ce, !the film unque.@stio^_nably *`[c%:reates its ow=--n atm[osp%$here a;
nd goes in a ve-`ry di^)ffer_ent direct\=i_on$\ from its more famo^/ us mode?l. Mulot&))#39s film has ;great c=:.\inematography,` an interesting script co)nstructi[on a;nd a ver\.?y m
(el ancholic?  mood that mar(#? ks it out fro[m m/ost low budget shocker:s of the period%-. Althou*gh not a [ cos,tum! e piece as such, !-;it is .@probably cl oser t\=+o the clas._sic\ Mi
ll@\ o\ =[f t# _he Stone [$Wom en than to Franju's film.　　The actin.,g` and dire:(ction are o;f a uniformly ]/hi#gh @stan dard. Ann.#y (.Du%@perey and Philip Lemaire i/]mpart r )eal  de#(pth t%o ![their`]+ characte`rizations \and it's gre]?+at t)o see ];^Euro lege?nd Howa;r
d[?@ V_:ernon once again. Th@ _e film(=? w^as sold as a m;ixture of s`%ex an^d h`orror and the sex is
( / ?provide$-))d; by__ a bevy of (/:st@\unn/ing*=+ Eur/o babes# incl$)[uding^ Valerie Boi[ sgel and Michele P:\ere+ ll`/o w!-)ho` w):ent o/;n to featu@
; re in / Morga_\;^ne et s!,es Nym_phes befo,re disapp:[earing in(^!to : t?
he* hinter^lands
`of /por*%n.　　Well wort:h more%/ than a p.
assing look for a :ny fan o ;@f classy Euro =hor!.r+]o +r,+( t?*h]``?is ?one ;:$:(has ;probab:ly im :pr_%oved -with age an[#.d repays +%repe)ate!d viewings.　　Was the-  ` above comment useful to you?